Fascist Empire Planet

England Expects: Choices, choices.

Tue, 18 Nov 2008 15:09:48 +0000

This week the Tory delegation get to vote on their new delegation leader. This man will be responsible for the European Election campaign for next year.

And whose hats are in the ring?

Step forward

Timothy Kirhope - again
James Elles

Yes you read that right James Elles, what is more James is being supported by the Eurosceptric wing of the party. They believe that they have a promise from him to give them posts, PPS, Whip etc.

However they made that style of deal before when they supported the extremely able and extremely Europhile Jonathan Evans for leader. He won, and then proceded over a few months to strip himself of the Eurosceptic cordon sanitaire. Will history repeat itself?

Oh and the leader will also be largely responsible for running the negotiations with other national delegations to create the new Tory Group after the European Elections. Timothey has a track ecord of failing to do this in the past, and Elles...

And the winner is...

Timothy Kirkhope.

Pity poor James Holtum, The current - and lets be honest rather effective Tory Press Officer was in a previous life Tory Press officer, when Kirkhope was last leader of the delegation. He didn't keep the job for long. Oh dear.

Overheard

One Tory MEP to another
"You've haerd the news, Kirkhope won"
"Oh shit!"
"Yes that is what i said"

Judicial Watch: Judicial Watch Statement on Obama’s Selection of Clinton Impeachment Lawyer Greg Craig to Serve as White House Counsel

Tue, 18 Nov 2008 15:05:10 +0000

Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton issued the following statement today in response to Barack Obama's decision to hire Clinton impeachment lawyer and controversial Washington, DC, attorney Greg Craig as White House Counsel.

"It is disturbing that Barack Obama will allow Bill Clinton's impeachment lawyer Greg Craig to serve as his White House Counsel. Many thought Barack Obama had beaten the Clinton political machine. Instead, he appears to have embraced it. Given his defense of Bill Clinton's lies and obstruction of justice, what sort of legal advice will Mr. Craig give to President Obama? Will it all depend on what the meaning of 'is' is?

"Not only did Greg Craig defend the worst of the worst of the Clinton scandals but he also defended the violent government raid that delivered Elian Gonzalez back to Castro's Cuba. In fact, we believe that Greg was working with communist Cuban government during the Elian affair. Greg Craig is the wrong lawyer to serve as White House Counsel in the Obama White House.

"Barack Obama's White House personnel decisions show that he doesn't seem to care about government integrity."

England Expects: Quote of the day

Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:28:33 +0000

There is no hope for Britian. Civilisations dont die, they commit suicide. And before they commit suicide, they read and believe the Guardian.

Via James Bartholomew and from the Guardian.

EU Referendum: Change one can believe in?

Tue, 18 Nov 2008 13:45:25 +0000

Strong rumours flying around that President-Elect Obama is going to make Hillary Clinton his Secretary of State. Well, he owes the lady. After all, she agreed to step aside at the Convention even though she had won the actual primary votes. The paying of debts will be a long process, given how many people have been promised something.

There are the unions who want the abolition of secret ballots (what will the Tory Socialists say to that?) and the Federal civil servants who were promised more power and more money; there are the journalists who appointed themselves to be Obama propagandists; above all, there are the Kennedys. We shall see.

Of course, Secretary of State Clinton was predicted by our friend John O'Sullivan, Executive Editor of Radior Free Europe/Radio Liberty. I found it hard to believe hime at the time and may well have to eat my words. We shall see. Our joint prediction about European reaction was accurate, I suspect.

TruthSeeker24: When It’s a Clear Day and You Can’t See GM

Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:52:08 +0000

http://www.prisonplanet.com/when-its-a-clear-day-and-you-cant-see-gm.html

http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/vernon/081117A blog with relevant information for the world.

Continuing Counter Reformation: Vertriebenen!!!

Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:41:11 +0000

Stop the Jesuit's Future War
By Spotlighting the Origins of Past War
Wlodimir Ledochowski's Kulterkampf Revenge

UPDATE: The persons below have been emailed the following message on November 5, 2008:

Of interest to the Prussian community:

http://continuingcounterreformation.blogspot.com/2008/11/vertriebenen.html

Douglas Willinger
http://continuingcounterreformation.blogspot.com/

--------------
http://209.85.171.104/translate_c?hl=en&sl=de&u=http://www.ostdeutsches-forum.net/forum/moderatoren.htm&prev=/search%3Fq%3DOst%2BPreussen%2Bde%26hl%3Den%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official%26hs%3DxWU%26sa%3DX&usg=ALkJrhioXZjttnSbToCcc2z-vT7329objw

The forum is maintained by ...

Andreas Kurt Borm Andreas Kurt Borm
— Bereiche: Nördliches Ostpreußen, Tilsit - Areas: North East Prussia, Tilsit

E-Post an Andreas Kurt Borm E-mail to Andreas Kurt Borm
Walter Mogk Walter Mogk
— Mitglied des Vorstands der Heimatkreisgemeinschaft - Member of the Board of Community Heimatkreis
Gerdauen e. V. und Kirchspielvertreter von Nordenburg Gerdauen e. V. and parish representatives from North Castle
— Bereiche: Kreis Gerdauen, Bartener Land, Politik und Geschichte. - Areas: Gerdauen circle, Bart country, politics and history.
— Projekte: Betreuer der Kreis-Gerdauen-Seite und - Projects: supervisor of the county Gerdauen page and
Betreiber der Nordenburg-Homepage Operators of the North Castle homepage
— Mehr über Walter: Eigene Netzseite - More about Walter: My Network page

E-Post an Walter Mogk E-mail to Walter Mogk
Beate Szillis-Kappelhoff Beate Szillis-Kappelhoff
— Mitglied der Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Memellandkreise (AdM) - Members of the Memelland Association of circles (ADM)
http://www.memelland-adm.de/ http://www.memelland-adm.de/
— Moderatorin in der Ahnenforschungsgruppe Memelland, - Presenter in the Genealogy Research Memelland,
http://de.groups.yahoo.com/group/memelland/ http://de.groups.yahoo.com/group/memelland/
— Mitglied der Prußenvereinigung Tolkemita eV - Member of Prußenvereinigung Tolkemita eV
— Bereiche: Prußische Kultur und Sprache, Ahnenforschung - Areas: Prußische culture and language, genealogy

' E-Post an Beate Szillis-Kappelhoff 'E-mail to Beate Szillis-Kappelhoff
Werner Schuka Werner Schuka
— Mitglied im Kreistag der Kreisgemeinschaft Johannisburg - Member of the district of Community District Johannesburg
zuständig für: neue Medien, Internet-Präsenz, Archiv. responsible for: new media, internet presence Archives.
— Betreuung der Netzseiten: www.ostdeutsches-forum.net , sowie - Support of web pages: www.ostdeutsches-forum.net, and
www.BdV-jugend.de , www.Sczuka.net , www.Kreis-Johannisburg.de , www.BdV-jugend.de, www.Sczuka.net, www.Kreis-Johannisburg.de,
www.Kuratorium-Arnau.net , www.VFFOW.de , www.Ostpreussen-NRW.de . www.Kuratorium-Arnau.net, www.VFFOW.de, www.Ostpreussen-NRW.de.
— Bereiche: Masuren, Kreis Johannisburg, Familienforschung, - Areas: Masury, district of Johannesburg, family research,
weitere Infos unter: www.familienforschung-sczuka.de Further information: www.familienforschung-sczuka.de

E-Post an Werner Schuka E-mail to Werner Schuka

Peter Kalisch Peter Kalisch
— Mitglied des BJO ( www.ostpreussen-info.de ) - Member of the bjo (www.ostpreussen-info.de)
— Bereiche: Reisen, Landeskunde, regionale Schwerpunkte: - Areas: travel, geography, regional priorities:
die Kreise Lyck, Lötzen, Sensburg und Preußisch Eylau Elk circles, Gizycko, Mragowo and Prussian Eylau

E-Post an Peter Kalisch E-mail to Peter Kalisch
Andrea Dickerson Andrea Dickerson
— Bereiche: Mitgliederbetreuung, - Areas: Members care,
Übersetzung von deutschen Beiträgen für die Netzseite ins Englische. Translation of German contributions to the network page into English.

E-Post an Andrea-Dickerson E-mail to Andrea Dickerson
Jochen Zauner Jochen Zauner
— Mitglied im BJO ( www.ostpreussen-info.de ) und der - Member of the bjo (www.ostpreussen-info.de) and
AG Junge Generation im BdV ( www.bdv-jugend.de ). AG Young Generation in BDV (www.bdv-jugend.de).
— Bereiche: Ermland, Masuren. - Areas: Warmia, Masury.

E-Post an Jochen Zauner E-mail to Jochen Zauner
Interesse bei uns mitzumachen? Interest in us doing it?
Wir können immer freiwillige Mitarbeiter gebrauchen. We can always use volunteers.

http://209.85.171.104/translate_c?hl=en&sl=de&u=http://www.ostdeutsches-forum.net/forum/moderatoren.htm&prev=/search%3Fq%3DOst%2BPreussen%2Bde%26hl%3Den%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official%26hs%3DxWU%26sa%3DX&usg=ALkJrhioXZjttnSbToCcc2z-vT7329objw

--------------

Yes we do need volunteers!

We -- the World -- Share a common enemy.

Research Wlodimir Ledochowski, 26th Superior General of the Jesuit Order, and his Kulterkampf Revenge WW2 destruction of Prussia.

See this blog's tag's "Wlodimir Ledochowski" and "Kulterkampf Revenge"

And please see that messages about this are NOT deleted from the message boards.

http://avlesbeluskesexposed.blogspot.com/2008/11/hands-of-rome-on-vertriebenen-of.html

Can anyone explain the censorship on the East Prussian message board?

Translation: German » English
		ERROR: IP blocking The IP number and you post is locked. You can not contribute write here.

There is apparently a traitor in control of the following board:

http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=de&u=http://www.ostpreussen.de.vu/&sa=X&oi=translate&resnum=5&ct=result&prev=/search%3Fq%3DOst%2BPreussen%2Bde%26hl%3Den%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official%26hs%3DxWU%26sa%3DX
http://www.ostpreussen.de.vu/

This is the message that is being censored:

---

Geschrieben von Avle am 02. November 2008 10:49:48:

Als Antwort auf: Wlodimir Ledochowski's Revenge for the Kulterkampf geschrieben von Douglas Willinger am 02. November 2008 05:34:08:
Explore the topics "Wlodimir Ledochowski" and "Kulterkampf Revenge" in "Continuing Counter Reformation"

http://continuingcounterreformation.blogspot.com/2007/08/wlodimir-vladimir-ledochowskis_22.html
http://continuingcounterreformation.blogspot.com/2007/06/wlodimir-vladimir-ledochowski-mission.html
http://continuingcounterreformation.blogspot.com/2008/10/wlodimir-vladimir-ledochowski-bdv-to_22.html
-----------------------------------------

---

Also censored:

The same strategy has been applied in the North Adriatic regions --- The priests of Rome controlling both Roman Catholic Italians and Slovenians, with the help of the Irredentism Italian nationalism and of the later Fascism, created an abyss of hate among both ethnic communities. The Reformation history of the North Adriatic regions has been covered by thousands and thousands of corpses of the ethnic-ideological war. After the smokes of the II Thirty Years war disappeard, in 1945, only the Roman Catholic church legitimezed hereself as the 'only organization able to bypass the horrors of the past'. Take note how the Vertriebenen of Europe concentrate just in the corridor "Baltic sea - North Adriatic sea" (once the ancient "Amber path"). From the German Protestants displaced from Poland to the Sudeten German of Central Europe, to the by Tito's wiped-away (and also murdered) R.C. Italians from Istria: doesn't talk to you this picture about an occult war to shape Europe in a previous-Luther, against-Luther Middle Age?
Best regards/Herzliche Grusse

Avles Beluskes Exposed

Continuing Counter Reformation: Morales-Vatican Spar in Bolivia

Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:38:25 +0000

http://www.miamiherald.com/news/americas/AP/story/772162.html

Evo Morales, Catholic Church spar in Bolivia
Associated Press

November 14, 2008
LA PAZ, Bolivia -- The Bolivian government says comments by the Roman Catholic Church casting its political reforms as divisive are ``surprising.''
Bolivian Cardinal Julio Terrazas has told Pope Benedict XVI that President Evo Morales is not building ''a Bolivia for all'' with reforms benefiting the country's indigenous poor.
The pontiff later said he was concerned for the South American nation after Terrazas' visit to the Vatican on Monday.

Top government minister Sacha Llorenti said on Friday that the criticism was ''surprising,'' because a once-divided Congress reached a compromise last month on Morales' new constitution.
Morales on Wednesday criticized the church's past ''domination'' of Bolivia's indigenous people and its present-day political power.

Morales and the RCC clashed about two years ago regarding the religious orientation of Bolivia's schools, with Morales then commenting -- words to the effect -- that the RCC sometimes behaves as if the inquisition were still occurring.

http://www.catholicreport.org/index.php?id=196
Bolivia's President Morales Now Says Church Has A Record Of Damaging Bolivia, Says Church Leaders Always Gravitate To The Oligarchy I posted a similar story yesterday. Yet, I see Morales is still on quite a roll. I noticed that Fidel Castro recently celebrated his 80th birthday. Perhaps Morales' diatribe against the Church is a present for old Fidel. Such revolutionary talk probably brings some joy to the aging thug. Here's hoping that Castro isn't around for too many more birthdays. Meaning he will have a Damascus experience on the road to Havana and change his ways. I am not holding my breath but know with God all things are possible!
Click Here For Comments About Bolivia's Evo Morales

Continuing Counter Reformation: Morales Speaks At Jesuit Fordham University

Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:32:12 +0000

http://www.fordham.edu/campus_resources/enewsroom/archives/archive_1408.asp

Bolivian President Morales to Speak at Fordham on Nov. 17

Contact: Syd Steinhardt
(212) 636-6534
steinhardt@fordham.edu

President Evo Morales of Bolivia will address members of the Fordham community on "The Realities Of Democracy" on Monday, Nov. 17 at 4 p.m. at McNally Amphitheatre.

In his address, President Morales will express his thanks to the civil society and nations that supported his government during the recent violence in Santa Cruz; discuss the negotiations that led to the agreement his government reached with the opposition on proposed constitutional changes; and explain how those changes, which are subject to the results of a Jan. 25 referendum, will work within the framework of Bolivian democracy.

WHO:
His Excellency Juan Evo Morales Ayma
President, Republic of Bolivia

WHAT:
"The Realities Of Democracy"

WHEN:
Monday, Nov. 17
4 p.m. EST

WHERE:
Fordham University
McNally Amphitheater
140 W. 62nd St. at Columbus Avenue
New York

RSVP:
felz@fordham.edu by Friday, Nov. 14

The address is sponsored by the Institute of International Humanitarian Affairs at Fordham University (Kevin M. Cahill, M.D., director) and His Excellency Miguel d’Escoto Brockmann, president of the 63rd General Assembly of the United Nations.

For security purposes, all attendees must be seated by 3:30 p.m. Large bags and backpacks will not be allowed in the auditorium.

Established in 1945 under the Charter of the United Nations, the General Assembly occupies a central position as the chief deliberative, policymaking and representative organ of the United Nations. Comprising all 192 Members of the United Nations, it provides a unique forum for multilateral discussion of the full spectrum of international issues covered by the Charter.

The Institute of International Humanitarian Affairs at Fordham University offers an academic base for the study and development of international health, human rights, and other humanitarian issues, especially those that occur in periods of conflict.

At a time when terrorism and war are at the forefront of world affairs, the Institute trains humanitarian workers in the critical skills needed to aid in crises situations. The Institute identifies fundamental needs and uses its talents, contacts, and resources to define practical solutions, while initiating dialogue, understanding, and cooperation among people and nations divided by war.

Founded in 1841, Fordham is the Jesuit University of New York, offering exceptional education distinguished by the Jesuit tradition to approximately 14,700 students in its four undergraduate colleges and its six graduate and professional schools. It has residential campuses in the Bronx and Manhattan, a campus in Westchester, and the Louis Calder Center Biological Field Station in Armonk, N.Y.
11/08

TruthSeeker24: Howard Zinn: “I Don’t Care” If 9/11 Was An Inside Job

Tue, 18 Nov 2008 09:58:42 +0000

From http://www.prisonplanet.com/howard-zinn-i-dont-care-if-911-was-an-inside-job.html

Howard Zinn: “I Don’t Care” If 9/11 Was An Inside Job

Another gatekeeper illustrates the intellectual cowardice of the establishment left

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Tuesday, November 18, 2008

World renowned peace activist and left-wing anti-war icon Howard Zinn recently told an audience that he didn’t care if 9/11 was an inside job, echoing the disdainful and apathetic rhetoric of fellow liberal gatekeepers Noam Chomsky and Alexander Cockburn in dismissing the efforts of the 9/11 truth movement.

Buddy Moore, Independent Candidate for US Senate in Colorado, asked Zinn if he would join him in voicing doubts about the official 9/11 story and in particular the demolition of the twin towers and Building 7.

Zinn said he was skeptical of the official story but then stated, “I don’t know much about the situation and the truth is, I don’t care that much about it, that’s passed….that’s a diversion from what we really have to do,” adding that debating who was behind 9/11, “gets in the way of dealing with the immediate situation”.

Moore attempted to ask Zinn a follow up question about allowing the perpetrators to go free but was largely shouted down by Zinn’s fawning army of left-wing sycophants.

Watch the clip below.

src="http://www.youtube.com/v/S-WQ5z53lW8&hl=en&fs=1"
allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always">

Zinn’s comments echo similar sentiments expressed by fellow left-wing luminary, Noam Chomsky, who has repeatedly expressed arrogance and contempt towards the 9/11 truth movement while invoking apathy towards the contention that there was government complicity in the attacks, despite the fact that the 9/11 attacks happening exactly as the government maintains was key to launching the invasions of both Afghanistan and Iraq, as well as the massive rollback in civil liberties that has occurred over the last seven years.

During a 2006 Internet forum event, Chomsky claimed that the 9/11 truth movement peddled “arcane and dubious theories” and had distracted activists from pursuing “crimes that are far more serious than blowing up the WTC,” presumably belittling the deaths of around 2,000 Americans, along with hundreds of thousands of Afghanis and Iraqis, as well as thousands of U.S. troops in the wars that followed that could not have been launched without the pretext of 9/11.

When a critic asked Chomsky why he was so dismissive of the supposition that 9/11 was a false flag event, pointing out numerous other examples throughout history including the bombing of the Maine, the Gulf of Tonkin incident and Pearl Harbor, Chomsky merely reiterated his insolence, stating, “The concept of “false flag operation” is not a very serious one, in my opinion. None of the examples you describe, or any other in history, has even a remote resemblance to the alleged 9/11 conspiracy. I’d suggest that you look at each of them carefully.”

(ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW)

Chomsky actually dismissed U.S. government complicity in 9/11 a mere four months after the event, and over a year before it was again invoked as a reason to invade Iraq, when he told an audience at a FAIR event at New York’s Town Hall, 22 January 2002, “That’s an internet theory and it’s hopelessly implausible. Hopelessly implausible. So hopelessly implausible I don’t see any point in talking about it,” in response to a question about U.S. government foreknowledge.

Note that Professor Chomsky also vehemently maintains that Lee Harvey Oswald was the long gunman in the JFK assassination, even despite polls showing that around 80 per cent of the American public believe otherwise.

Chomsky was presented with convincing evidence for a wider plot by JFK assassination experts as far back as 1969 and according to Selwyn Bromberger, an MIT philosophy professor who had sit in on the discussion, Chomsky indicated that he believed there was a conspiracy, but has failed to voice his conclusion for nearly 40 years.

It’s painfully clear that the likes of Zinn and Chomsky are intellectual cowards who, despite being abundantly aware of the fact that both 9/11 and the JFK assassination represent far wider conspiracies than the official version of events dictates, they are afraid of using their prominent soapboxes to bring either subject to wider attention for fear of whatever reprisals might ensue. As Vincent Salandria enunciates, this makes them worse than disinformation agents.

“I agree that Professor Chomsky is not a CIA agent,” states Salandria, “But with respect to his pronouncements on the JFK assassination he is worse than a CIA agent. Without being an agent, with his enormous prestige as a thinker, as an independent radical, as a courageous man, he does the work of the agency.”

Indeed, at the time of the release of Oliver Stone’s JFK movie, Howard Zinn, Noam Chomsky and another liberal luminary, Alexander Cockburn, went on a seemingly orchestrated media campaign in an attempt to convince the public that the JFK assassination was not a wider conspiracy and also that it didn’t matter even if it was.

“When cornered themselves, Chomsky and Cockburn resort to rhetorical devices like exaggeration, sarcasm, and ridicule. In other words, they resort to propaganda and evasion,” notes one blogger.

The same rhetoric was utilized when questions about 9/11 reached a crescendo. Cockburn, Zinn and Chomsky not only dismiss clear evidence that the official story is demonstrably false, but in addition attempt to generate apathy around the whole issue, classic gatekeeper behavior in preventing the left from becoming active in pursuing the truth about 9/11.

A blog with relevant information for the world.

TruthSeeker24: WND news

Tue, 18 Nov 2008 09:55:04 +0000

http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=81296

http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=81318

http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=81317

http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=81321

http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=81310

http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=81316

http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=81267

http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=81307A blog with relevant information for the world.

TruthSeeker24: Irish Times Lisbon poll fools public - Deception has set in for referendum 2

Tue, 18 Nov 2008 09:52:00 +0000

http://www.prisonplanet.com/irish-times-lisbon-poll-fools-public-deception-has-set-in-for-referendum-2.htmlA blog with relevant information for the world.

TruthSeeker24: The Crooks and Liars blog is a Left Gatekeeping group

Tue, 18 Nov 2008 09:02:12 +0000

http://www.prisonplanet.com/crooks-and-liars-smears-ron-paul-bans-me-from-site-for-expressing-my-dissent.htmlA blog with relevant information for the world.

TruthSeeker24: Who is Mike Barnicle?

Tue, 18 Nov 2008 08:16:45 +0000

http://radioequalizer.blogspot.com/2007/04/imus-fired-mike-barnicle-wfan-new-york.html

http://newsbusters.org/people/mike-barnicleA blog with relevant information for the world.

TruthSeeker24: Stem Cell Therapy Helps Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Patients!

Tue, 18 Nov 2008 07:59:46 +0000

http://donmargolis.com/blog/2008/11/stem-cell-therapy-helps-multiple-sclerosis-ms-patients/

http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20081116/ms_treatment_081116/20081116?hub=HealthA blog with relevant information for the world.

TruthSeeker24: Pro-Abortion Group Sets Up Obama, Congressional Attack on Pregnancy Centers

Tue, 18 Nov 2008 07:57:26 +0000

http://lifenews.com/nat4577.htmlA blog with relevant information for the world.

EndrTimes: Masonic Disinformation, Propaganda, Dissembling, and Hate Techniques

Tue, 18 Nov 2008 07:50:01 +0000

Masons have nearly predictable means and methods, often less than savory. Whether it's because they're pushing their ideas:

* In order to sell books. * Rampant paranoia or hate. * Their altered belief system (they think it will get them standing before the "Great White Throne" of the "Great Architect of the Universe" in the "Great White Lodge of Freemasonry" of Sirius, which they believe they will go to when they die if their masonic "work" has not been "slip-shod").* Their In-Group World View has been so much altered that for practical purposes of debate they have diminished capacity, i.e. they have become insane.

Masons use many different tactics to support their position. To further their goals, they'll use books published by 'vanity' publishers who may be Masonic as well. They will claim that "Pro" writings about Masons or Masonry cannot be published by 'legitimate' publishers because they're all "Anti"-Masonically-controlled. (In reality, it's because their tracts fail to meet the 'standards' of research required by traditional publishers - but often Masonic Propaganda and Dissembling Specialists fails to let truth enter the discussion). In addition, there are "Open Houses" and "Parades" held in the United States each year gathering a small group of Masons. Web pages, sometimes thinly disguised as information about "Difficult Questions about Freemasonry", and postings to various online venues add to their constant stream of misinformation.

In this section, we talk about those who're visible in their Masonic activities (i.e., not hiding behind some on-line identity which changes frequently). We also provide a review of some internal inconsistencies in their arguments and offer some of our thoughts on responding to 'Masonic Disinformation Propagandists'.

The repertoire of techniques is varied but most involve simple deceit. Common tactics are listed below.

Change the Subject Guilt by Association Using Different Standards If You Were ...Refuse to Answer Outright Lies Oft-Repeated Falsehoods Quibble over Semantics Faulty Logic Assumptive Positions Prove It! Straw Man Behave More Like a Christian or a Non "Stupid Athiest"

Change the Subject: In our daily lives, we generally experience a fairly straight path when we discuss things with others. We're not experienced with those who would deliberately mislead or misdirect. Thus, when this tactic of deceit is used, Non -Masons are caught off-guard. Assuming that the person with whom they're dealing has the same degree of honesty and integrity as themselves, it's a surprise to find that they're being led around in circles.

Guilt by Association: Those defending Masons and Masonry will point out human foibles or errors an individual critic of Masonry may have made as if somehow once a man becomes a "Anti" (as masons deceptively and derisively term those who question Masonic Disinformation tactics) , he loses all right to individual foibles . Because one person does a wrong, the argument goes, "Anti"-Masons are all guilty of it. What those Masonic Dissemblers fail to acknowledge is that there were also those with whom they have been associated in the past engaged in similar wrongs.

Using Different Standards: Masons will use any convenient argument to support their position. Despite the passage of decades (or even centuries), they'll readily apply 1850s or 1770s standards to those in the 1990s! Yes George Washington owned slaves and Albert Pike and Nathan Forest were in the KKK, but then so did everybody else ? Then obviously - so the argument goes - he was a very good Mason! It's convenient to use the political correctness of today to condemn critics of Masonry by branding them "Haters" as practiced professional dissemblers. Don't fall for this sometimes overlooked ploy.

"If You Were....": This presumptive position often taken creates an untenable position - which is exactly the way the Masonic Disinformation Propagandist wishes it. "If you were to hit your wife...." is not far from the question "When did you stop beating your wife?". Such innuendo should be recognized for what it is.

Refuse To Answer: In an attempt to understand the motives of "hatred", the Masonic supporter will often ask, "Why do you feel this way?" or "What religion do you belong to?", or "You're a Stupid Athiest aren't you?" hoping that the answers will somehow provide enlightenment into the rationale for the position the "Anti"-Mason is taking. As might be expected, those Masons who criticize those who want to 'tear down the walls of secrecy' they see in Masonry are often the most secretive themselves. Certainly, there's the exception who will even boast about certain parts of their lives, almost inviting the onlooker to become involved. In reality, though, they've done nothing more than to set a trap which they'll later use against others. "Why I even had some "Anti"-Mason show up at my door the other night. He had tracked me down and...."
Outright Lies: In our section on the categories of Masonic disinformation and propagansa activity, we identify several outright lies. This, however, does not stop them from being spread again and again.

Oft-Repeated Falsehoods: Sometimes when a charge is made, it's difficult to determine whether it's true or not. "Not all of the police who're 'on the take' in London are Masons." is an example seen recently. Of course, this presumes that the one making the statement knows not only the Masonic membership status of every London police officer but also all of those who engage in illegal activities. It should be clear to even the most cursory observer how foolish this is - but to those who use this tactic, it makes perfect sense. Further, perpetuation of such foolishness will surely occur at some later time ("I read somewhere that all of the critics of Freemasonry....").
Quibbling Over Semantics: This is a ploy of some who have engaged in these debates for a long period of time. One Masonic Disinformation Specialist from Maine, USA has frequently argued that he's not an "Anti" Mason Critic but rather "Anti" Mason Critical !!! and furthers this by saying that he specifically opposes the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry. When called an Masonic Propagandist and Disinformation Specialist , he'll protest loudly. In reality it's merely a technique he uses in order to give him further opportunity to expound his hatred (and also encourage the Non-Mason (who Masons derisively refer to as the "Profane" and "Cowans") to think that if only the question of language could be resolved, this person would change his position).

Faulty Logic: We see it often in the arguments which start with the wrong premise. For example: "All eggs are white. This round object is white and has all the properties of an egg. Therefore, this must be an egg." Wrong. You've forgotten (or perhaps don't know) that eggs come in brown also. It is an easy trap to fall into.

Assumptive Positions: One of the most common tactics used against those who critize Masonic Propagada and Disinformation Specialists is designed to provoke a response which ignores the false premise. "If a "Cowan" did (thus and so), what would you do?" Of course, any time a "Profane" violates a law, rule, or trust, we are all the lesser for it - and, being human, that sometimes happens. This argument, however, often makes wild and fanciful suppositions in order to provoke the reader/listener into drawing the conclusion that such things did/do indeed happen - and perhaps regularly.

"Prove It!": The reality is that negatives can rarely be proven but detractors ignore this, always looking for some other avenue to exploit. "Post all of the degree work right here and we'll see what it says...." goes a common challenge. Of course, regardless of what was posted, the Masonic Disinformation Specialist will find some fault, even if it's a spelling error - and then will proceed to make some particular issue out of that. ("See? Those stupid Cowans. They can't even spell!")
Straw Man: One very common tactic used by Masonic Disinformation and Propaganda Specialists is to put forth a 'Straw Man': one who claims to have 'seen the darkness' and now can explain to the world from the 'inside perspective' the many supposed problems with those who criticize Masons and Masonry. Most of these are readily seen as a total fraud (the supposed Mason who's now a 'minister' but is apparently too embarrassed to reveal his denominational affiliation or the person who claims to be a 'high ranking Church Official' who'll reveal all). To the unknowing, however, these pretenders are difficult to discern and can be very persuasive.
Behave More Like a Christian or a Non "Stupid Athiest": We've always found it ironic that those who believe Masonry to be so very right would use this argument. It seems, though, that whenever a Non-Mason has been goaded enough and lashes out at his tormentor, you frequently see the retort "That's not very Christian Behavior is it?", or "You're a Stupid Athiest aren't you?". Strange that in one breath they want us to abandon Christianity or our right not to "believe" but in the next, they remind us of the standards we set for ourselves and encourage us to act in accordance with them. Masonic Disinformation and Dissembling is pretty strange....
It's frustrating. A person who tries to follow the tenets of tolerance and truth assumes the best about his accuser and will believe that a clear presentation of facts will be sufficient to explain things. As you'll see as you question Masonry, however, not everything is what it seems - and if you're willing not to believe the Masonic rhetoric without proof from them, we trust that you'll find the evidence we provide - even more convincing.

Good luck and don't give up. Remember trained, experienced, Masonic disinformation, propaganda, dissembling, and hate specialists are clever. Be on your "due guard".
Masons angered by Associated Press Story: Masonic "Information" Center

A Comprehensive Listing of Masonic "Divert the Discourse" Gambits

1. Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil. Regardless of what you know, don't discuss it -- especially if you are a public figure or Lodge official. If it's not reported, it didn't happen, and you never have to deal with the issues.
2. Become incredulous and indignant. Avoid discussing key issues and instead focus on side issues which can be used show the topic as being critical of some otherwise sacrosanct group or theme. This is also known as the "How dare you!" gambit.
3. Create rumor mongers. Avoid discussing issues by describing all charges, regardless of venue or evidence, as mere rumors and wild accusations. Other derogatory terms mutually exclusive of truth may work as well. This method works especially well with a silent press, because the only way the public can learn of the facts are through such "arguable rumors". If you can associate the material with the Internet, use this fact to certify it a "wild rumor" which can have no basis in fact.
4. Use a straw man. Find or create a seeming element of your opponent's argument which you can easily knock down to make yourself look good and the opponent to look bad. Either make up an issue you may safely imply exists based on your interpretation of the opponent/opponent arguments/situation, or select the weakest aspect of the weakest charges. Amplify their significance and destroy them in a way which appears to debunk all the charges, real and fabricated alike, while actually avoiding discussion of the real issues.
5. Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule. This is also known as the primary attack the messenger ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as "kooks", "right-wing", "liberal", "left-wing", "terrorists", "conspiracy buffs", "radicals", "militia", "racists", "religious fanatics", "sexual deviates", and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues.
6. Hit and Run. In any public forum, make a brief attack of your opponent or the opponent position and then scamper off before an answer can be fielded, or simply ignore any answer. This works extremely well in Internet and letters-to -the-editor environments where a steady stream of new identities can be called upon without having to explain criticism reasoning -- simply make an accusation or other attack, never discussing issues, and never answering any subsequent response, for that would dignify the opponent's viewpoint.
7. Question motives. Twist or amplify any fact which could so taken to imply that the opponent operates out of a hidden personal agenda or other bias. This avoids discussing issues and forces the accuser on the defensive.
8. Invoke authority. Claim for yourself or associate yourself with authority and present your argument with enough "jargon" and "minutiae" to illustrate you are "one who knows", and simply say it isn't so without discussing issues or demonstrating concretely why or citing sources.
9. Play Dumb. No matter what evidence or logical argument is offered, avoid discussing issues with denial they have any credibility, make any sense, provide any proof, contain or make a point, have logic, or support a conclusion. Mix well for maximum effect.
10. Associate opponent charges with old news. A derivative of the straw man usually, in any large-scale matter of high visibility, someone will make charges early on which can be or were already easily dealt with. Where it can be foreseen, have your own side raise a straw man issue and have it dealt with early on as part of the initial contingency plans. Subsequent charges, regardless of validity or new ground uncovered, can usually them be associated with the original charge and dismissed as simply being a rehash without need to address current issues -- so much the better where the opponent is or was involved with the original source.
11. Establish and rely upon fall-back positions. Using a minor matter or element of the facts, take the "high road" and "confess" with candor that some innocent mistake, in hindsight, was made -- but that opponents have seized on the opportunity to blow it all out of proportion and imply greater criminalities which, "just isn't so." Others can reinforce this on your behalf, later. Done properly, this can garner sympathy and respect for "coming clean" and "owning up" to your mistakes without addressing more serious issues.
12. Enigmas have no solution. Drawing upon the overall umbrella of events surrounding the crime and the multitude of players and events, paint the entire affair as too complex to solve. This causes those otherwise following the matter to begin to loose interest more quickly without having to address the actual issues.
13. Alice in Wonderland Logic. Avoid discussion of the issues by reasoning backwards with an apparent deductive logic in a way that forbears any actual material fact.
14. Demand complete solutions. Avoid the issues by requiring opponents to solve the crime at hand completely, a ploy which works best for items qualifying for rule 10.
15. Fit the facts to alternate conclusions. This requires creative thinking unless the crime was planned with contingency conclusions in place.
16. Vanishing evidence and witnesses. If it does not exist, it is not fact, and you won't have to address the issue.
17. Change the subject. Usually in connection with one of the other ploys listed here, find a way to side-track the discussion with abrasive or controversial comments in hopes of turning attention to a new, more manageable topic. This works especially well with companions who can "argue" with you over the new topic and polarize the discussion arena in order to avoid discussing more key issues.
18. Emotionalize, Antagonize, and Goad Opponents. If you can't do anything else, chide and taunt your opponents and draw them into emotional responses which will tend to make them look foolish and overly motivated, and generally render their material somewhat less coherent. Not only will you avoid discussing the issues in the first instance, but even if their emotional response addresses the issue, you can further avoid the issues by then focusing on how "sensitive they are to criticism".
19. Ignore proof presented, demand impossible proofs. This is perhaps a variant of the "play dumb" rule. Regardless of what material may be presented by an opponent in public forums, claim the material irrelevant and demand proof that is impossible for the opponent to come by (it may exist, but not be at his disposal, or it may be something which is known to be safely destroyed or withheld, such as a murder weapon). In order to completely avoid discussing issues may require you to categorically deny and be critical of media or books as valid sources, deny that witnesses are acceptable, or even deny that statements made by government or other authorities have any meaning or relevance.
20. False evidence. Whenever possible, introduce new facts or clues designed and manufactured to conflict with opponent presentations as useful tools to neutralize sensitive issues or impede resolution. This works best when the crime was designed with contingencies for the purpose, and the facts cannot be easily separated from the fabrications.
21. Call a Grand Jury, Special Prosecutor, or other empowered investigative body. Subvert the (process) to your benefit and effectively neutralize all sensitive issues without open discussion. Once convened, the evidence and testimony are required to be secret when properly handled. For instance, if you own the prosecuting attorney, it can insure a Grand Jury hears no useful evidence and that the evidence is sealed an unavailable to subsequent investigators. Once a favorable verdict (usually, this technique is applied to find the guilty innocent, but it can also be used to obtain charges when seeking to frame a victim) is achieved, the matter can be considered officially closed.
22. Manufacture a new truth. Create your own expert(s), group(s), author(s), leader(s) or influence existing ones willing to forge new ground via scientific, investigative, or social research or testimony which concludes favorably. In this way, if you must actually address issues, you can do so authoritatively.
23. Create bigger distractions. If the above does not seem to be working to distract from sensitive issues, or to prevent unwanted media coverage of unstoppable events such as trials, create bigger news stories (or treat them as such) to distract the multitudes.
24. Silence critics. If the above methods do not prevail, consider removing opponents from circulation by some definitive solution so that the need to address issues is removed entirely. This can be by their death, arrest and detention, blackmail or destruction of their character by release of blackmail information, or merely by proper intimidation with blackmail or other threats.
25. Vanish. If you are a key holder of secrets or otherwise overly illuminated and you think the heat is getting too hot, to avoid the issues, vacate the kitchen.

Source: http://www.freemasonrywatch.org/masonicdisinformation.html .

WikiLeaks: Bank Julius Baer Mercury Trust estimated hidden amount USD 25M, 1999

Tue, 18 Nov 2008 07:40:23 +0000

Summary: Importing text file

{{leak
|country=Grand Cayman
|description=This is one of the many Julius Baer' Trust under investigation by American Authorities. Here it also shows dating of the documents which is important. It has nothing to do with the real date, it is a matter of sequence. Dating the document wrongly is as such already a criminal action instructed by Julius Baer. For learning purposes the documents required to set up a Trust are follows:

RE: MERCURY TRUST

* Trust Agreement dated May 27th between Inge Fischler and Julius Baer Trust Company (Cayman Ltd.)
*Appointment of James E. Hughes, Jr. as Protector of Mercury Trust
*Acceptance by James E. Hughes, Jr. of appointment as Protector of Mercury Trust and designation of G. Warren Whitaker as Successor Protector
*Acceptance by G. Warren Whitaker of appointment as Successor Protector of Mercury Trust
*Letter of instruction from the Grantor of Mercury Trust re her mailing address.
*Letter of instruction from the Grantor of Mercury Trust regarding the company Ammel Corp.
*Letter of Wishes from the Grantor of Mercury Trust
*Copy of Memorandum and Articles of Association of Ammel Corp.
*Certified Copy of Certificate of Incorporation of Ammel Corp.
*Stock Transfer form to be signed by the Shareholder of Ammel Corp. accepting the transfer of the subscribers share.
*Stock Transfer form to be signed by the Shareholder of Ammel Corp. transferring the shares to Julius Baer Trust Company (Cayman) Ltd. as Trustee of Mercury Trust
*Letter of request from Grantor of Mercury Trust regarding the acceptance of the shares of Ammel Corp. into Mercury Trust.
*Letter of request from Grantor of Mercury Trust regarding the appointment of the investment advisers.

The last four items require the signature of the Grantor. The last three should be dated after the account of Ammel Corp. with Bank Julius Baer & Co. Ltd. has been fully funded. Please return to the trustees in due course. Account opening forms have been sent to Bank Julius Baer & Co. Ltd., and the account officer there will be Thomas Fedier. The Marcuard Family Office will be appointed as Investment Managers after the shares have been settled into the Trust.

Dating instructions given by Julius Baer in order to cheat authorities and others. This is again a clear instruction to support tax cheating by Julius Baer.

|file_digest=SHA256 f97b0fdcebbcd7d8588431049b1022d3041aad95ad3ef1bb2a06d1e5c03b1635
|file_info=Zip archive data, at least v2.0 to extract
|file_name=julius-baer-mercury-trust-estimated-hidden-amount-usd-25-mio.zip
|file_size=170714
|lang=en
|organization=Julius Baer Cayman
|organization_type=COM
|release_date=2008-11-18
|title=Bank Julius Baer Mercury Trust estimated hidden amount USD 25M, 1999
}}

[[category:United States]]
[[category:Switzerland]]

WikiLeaks: Rosi Savich Trust maybe hidden from US tax authorities approx 2M USD, 1999

Tue, 18 Nov 2008 07:33:27 +0000

Summary: Importing text file

{{leak
|country=United States
|description=How to transfer funds to the US?

Simple, have a cheque issued by Julius Baer, Zurich and have it sent to your US address.

Present the Cheque in the US and the US Bank will give you the funds cash and charges Julius Baer, Zurich. Your name will not appear if you have the right deal with the Bank or use a Julius Baer representative in the US!

Therefore, standard payment instructions will be sent to Bank Julius Baer & Co. Ltd. Zurich to mail the cheque. Please ensure that the necessary funds are available in the account at that time that is the request Julius Baer Zurich comes up with.

That's all!

|file_digest=SHA256 0df1a898018a018a085457cd341e9313d92e3372e5b0f7d83a37c02f258e63a9
|file_info=Zip archive data, at least v2.0 to extract
|file_name=rosi-savich-trust-hidden-from-us-tax-authorities-usd-2-mio-approx.zip
|file_size=197991
|lang=en
|organization=Julius Baer Cayman
|organization_type=COM
|release_date=2008-11-18
|title=Rosi Savich Trust maybe hidden from US tax authorities approx 2M USD, 1999
}}

TruthSeeker24: Imperalism

Tue, 18 Nov 2008 07:30:47 +0000

http://www.lewrockwell.com/vance/vance155.html

Note by Me: I disagree with Vance's view that nationalism means unconditional support of the government's policy. Nationalism is simply a love of the existence of national sovereignity not calling the state infalliable. Also, many neo-liberals voted for McCain like Joseph Liberman, not just some neo-conservative Christians. Conservative Christians are not to be blame for all of the evils in this country. Vance is starting to play into the hands of the elite in saying that. The elite caused this war and conservative Christians are being used as scapegoats.

By TimothyA blog with relevant information for the world.

TruthSeeker24: Should We Worry About Deflation?

Tue, 18 Nov 2008 07:22:50 +0000

http://www.lewrockwell.com/french/french98.htmlA blog with relevant information for the world.

EndrTimes: Labor Unions and Trusts

Tue, 18 Nov 2008 07:14:45 +0000

Be patient therefore, brethren, unto the coming of the Lord. Behold, the husbandman waiteth for the precious fruit of the earth, and hath long patience for it, until he receive the early and latter rain......... James 5:7.

The trades unions will be one of the agencies that will bring upon this earth a time of trouble such as has not been since the world began.

In all our great cities there will be a binding up in bundles by the confederacies and unions formed. Men will rule other men and demand much of them. The lives of those who refuse to unite with these unions, will be in peril.

The work of the people of God is to prepare for the events of the future, which will soon come upon them with blinding force. In the world gigantic monopolies will be formed. Men will bind themselves together in unions that will wrap them in the folds of the enemy. A few men will combine to grasp all the means to be obtained in certain lines of business. Trades unions will be formed, and those who refuse to join these unions will be marked men. . . .

These unions are one of the signs of the last days. Men are binding up in bundles ready to be burned. They may be church members, but while they belong to these unions, they cannot possibly keep the commandments of God; for to belong to these unions means to disregard the entire Decalogue.

"Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy strength, and with all thy mind; and thy neighbour as thyself." . . . How can men obey these words, and form combinations that rob the poorer classes of the advantages which justly belong to them, preventing them from buying or selling, except under certain conditions.

Those who claim to be the children of God are in no case to bind up with the labor unions that are formed or that shall be formed. This the Lord forbids. Cannot those who study the prophecies see and understand what is before us?

Important issues must soon be met, and we wish to be hid in the cleft of the rock, that we may see Jesus, and be quickened by His Holy Spirit. We have no time to lose, not a moment.

Maranatha, E. G. White., p.182.

Aftermath News: Tallahassee Florida braces for record-breaking low temperatures

Tue, 18 Nov 2008 07:09:40 +0000

Record-breaking cold coming our way On Wednesday morning the projected low is 25 degrees Fahrenheit. If that proves correct, it would set a new record. The previous low for November 19 was 29 degrees and was set in 1990. Tallahassee Democrat | Nov 17, 2008 The National Weather Service in Tallahassee has issued a hard freeze warning [...]

EndrTimes: And men loved darkness rather than light,...

Tue, 18 Nov 2008 07:08:20 +0000

14And as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of man be lifted up:

15That whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have eternal life.

16For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.

17For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved.

18He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.

19And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil.

20For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved.

21But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God.

John 3: 14-21.